The table shows the percentage of the rooms occupied in six hotels during May to September between 1985 and 2000 The table also indicates the star rating of each hotel Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari

The table illustrates the proportion of the rooms which were occupied in six hotels between May and September from 1985 to 2000, along with obtaining of star ratings to each hotel.

As the table outlines, even though hotel Concorde and the Hamilton had received 5 stars, their occupancy of the rooms' percentage drop gradually throughout the period which ranged from 90 % in 1985 to 65% in 2000 by hotel Concorde, similarly, hamilton's proportion fell from hundred percent in initially to 70% in the final year.

In terms of 3-star rating hotels, hotel Oliva recorded 90% in 1985, which was grown by 5% in the final year. Likewise, the Continental Hotel which accounted for 79% in the beginning year, and raised by 1%. However, Hampton's hotel occupancy consistently maintained 100 percent, except in the year 1995 with the figure 90%. Concerning the four star hotel, which presented 57% in 1985 and 85% in 200.

Overall, the fourth star, the Tower hotel, and the Three-star Continental hotel displayed the least occupancy of the population throughout the period.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (4 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rooms'' or 'room's'?
Suggestion: rooms'; room's
...eceived 5 stars, their occupancy of the rooms percentage drop gradually throughout th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...milarly, hamiltons proportion fell from hundred percent in initially to 70% in the fina...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, may, similarly

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10857142857 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62632788138 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617142857143 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0649435978 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320897884615 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161183321278 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12449802745 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226180212158 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129881485227 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.