Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about the change. Discuss both and gi
Flora and fauna have been on the verge of distinction due to human activities. Although many argue that no solution will ever be affected, I still believe that humans can deal with this tendency by some effective measures.
On the one hand, the attempts of people can not lessen their impact on the existence of flora and fauna. First and foremost, the rise in population and migration leads to the lack of housing and food shortage. The necessity of pulling down trees in the forests where is a house for various species, such as endangered monkey species, and rare medicinal plants, is conducted to build housing. Therefore, natural resources have depleted, and the number of animals has significantly decreased. Furthermore, plants and animals fulfill a requirement of people; for instance, plants and animals are the major sources of producing medicines helping to cure diseases. As a result, humans need to use specialized animals and plants for drug preparation.
On the other hand, human beings can adopt measures to ameliorate environmental issues. Firstly, the authorities should introduce a new law to protect endangered species from poaching and hunting, also and encourage citizens to plant more trees to the density of forests. Finally, technology should invest in reintroducing and bringing back the natural habitat. For example, DNA samples of these creatures' closest living relatives reintroduce animals and plants back into existence.
In conclusion, whether people would agree with which ideas, it is undeniable that our intentional or unintentional activities considerably influence the living, especially awful ones, in this world. However, in my opinion, humans still have a chance to resolve the problems by enforcing efficient and proper regulations for humankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'creatures the closest'.
Suggestion: creatures the closest
...itat. For example, DNA samples of these creatures closest living relatives reintroduce animals an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44244604317 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91224096808 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658273381295 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0120517559 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204527961616 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612854425503 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514119722586 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111394522423 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242649644517 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.