In these days, mass production of commodity which has negative impacts on our environment has aroused people’s discussion. Although the problems associated with this situation can be pronounced, they are not without feasible solutions.
There are number of problems related to disastrous consequences to environment by commodity production. First, since more goods are produced, more toxic wastes and garbage are released from factories into nature. In fact, every year, countless manufacturing areas use plastic bags or packaged items, most of which are non-biodegradable for thousands of years, turning into a huge landfill and posing a threat to the living habitats of all creatures. Second, by making use of exceed material sources available to accommodate customer’s ever-increasing demands, individuals or companies make natural resources highly vulnerable. For example, more trees will be chopped down to produce paper, which means that there would not be enough oxygen in the air.
There are several workable measures to solve this problem. First, companies should promote the use of eco-friendlier materials. Given the fact that The Coffee House chain have promoted their customer to replace plastic straws of paper cup. In addition, encouragement the development of more sustainable manufacturing processes from government is imperative. For instant, many states in the US offer tax breaks and incentives for businesses using renewable energy and some firms are even allowed to purchase green energy at cheaper prices than traditional fossile fuels.
In conclusion, the expansion of consumer goods production cause severe damage to natural environment on account of two main reasons mentioned above. However, various measures can be tackle the problems only when concerted endeavors are made by individuals and government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78388278388 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09231281235 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688644688645 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7519098881 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136918703015 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426911126889 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826756340019 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928286910385 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814868379724 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.