An increasing number of people are now using dating websites to meet their second halves. Do you think this tendency help person or does more harm than good?
Nowadays, there is a gradual rise in the number of people who are using dating applications to meet their life partner. I think that this tendency can bring about more problems for society in the long run compared to any advantages it might bring.
Admittedly, there are some common benefits of using dating websites. Firstly, this type of websites gives a plethora of choices. As people choose their other ones according to their basis. Such as hobby, qualification and appearance, so it is very convenient for people. Secondly, there are many ways to communicate with their second halves. In today's era, due to the advancement of technology, social dating sites can bring different features for users. For instance, one prominent feature is video calling. Thus, by using that people do not away from the other one and do easily interact with each other.
Nevertheless, despite the advantages above, I believe using dating websites have disadvantages too. First and foremost, there is the possibility of arising compatibility issues. In a social dating site, there are the chances of people giving wrong data about their personal life and their family background. Therefore, the divorce rate has also increased. Another reason is that in the market this type of many fraud websites is also available. By that, companies sell the users personal data which can impact badly on users life. So, majorly trust problems can emerge.
In recapitulation, dating websites bring unlimited choices as well as better ways for communication. However, I believe that it does more harm than good because compatibility issues arise and chances of fraud to users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-08 | shivangini | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f websites gives a plethora of choices. As people choose their other ones accordin...
^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...personal data which can impact badly on users life. So, majorly trust problems can em...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20224719101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75558218488 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9509660427 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.1052631579 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0526315789 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300202972858 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734537445609 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597160509632 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173981083752 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297019641031 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.