An increasing number of people are now using dating websites to meet their second halves. Do you think this tendency help people or does more harm than good?
Nowadays, more and more people using online dating websites to meet their life partners. In my opinion, I think that doing this practice can bring about more problems for society compared to any advantage it might bring.
Admittedly, there are some basic benefits of searching the life partner online by these type of dating websites. The one is that people may get the widen range of choices. In other words, on these type of websites, there are number of people available so that the person can select from the broaden choices. The second is that from that widen the range, people often can get according to their preference so that they can end up selecting better or similar options. Last but not the least, the variety of ways of communicating is available in these type of websites so that people can communicate each other by the preference of them.
Nevertheless, despite the advantage above, I believe that this tendency has many demerits. Among the first is that the compatibility issue explaining broadly, sometimes the data provided by the users in these type of dating site are not genuine so these could end up in the high rate of diverse in the society. The second demerit is that the reliability of data which is provided by the users are less so the chances of getting fraudulent are higher. The third disadvantage is that these type of companies may sell your information to marketing site so that this could potentially damage one's privacy. The last negative aspect of it is that culture difference. In other words, some times due to the cultural difference, some of the families might not accept these type of relationships, so it may end up with conflict between families.
In recapitulation, these days, usage of dating site has become popular among people for selecting their better half. I think that the disadvantage of it outweighs any advantage it might bring
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-08 | patel_paras7777@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-08 | VIDHI PARMAR | 61 | view |
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do advantages of this development for society outweigh the advantage 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 61
- The diagram below shows the process of milk production
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sector s contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ebsites. The one is that people may get the widen range of choices. In other words, on th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...able so that the person can select from the broaden choices. The second is that from that w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e so that this could potentially damage ones privacy. The last negative aspect of it...
^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... could potentially damage ones privacy. The last negative aspect of it is that cult...
^^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e times due to the cultural difference, some of the families might not accept these type of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, i think, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88819875776 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66029275026 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481366459627 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3377942618 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193008877758 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072392055975 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773544710934 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141545704071 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841113056245 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.