Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be an effective?
Some of the individuals claim that accelerating the price of petrol is the best solution to tackle increasing traffic congestion and pollution issues, which are controversial problems all over the world. However, I completely disagree with this statement and think that there are numerous beneficial ways, that can be very effective.
On the one hand, increasing the price of petroleum is a more influential way to encourage the public for utilizing public transportation rather than their own petroleum-powered cars. As a result of this consequence, the risk of air pollution would be declined to a certain percent and the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide will reduce in the atmosphere. For instance, if the inhabitants utilize public transit, the number of traffic jams will decrease and everybody can attend their jobs, schools, or universities on the time. Nevertheless, there will be some misunderstandings among the residents, if the price of petrol will rise.
On the other hand, there are equally some effective strategies to eradicate pollution and traffic problems. The first and foremost one is reconstructing the country by building extra roads and bridges, that can create more comfort to move cars. Another beneficial solution is utilizing green energy like solar and wind power. For example, it is indisputable that nowadays, lots of countries are using green energy sources like the USA and UK. Furthermore, as a consequence of this trend, the atmosphere would be much more cleaner and the number of traffic jams would decrease to some extent.
In conclusion, accelerating the price of petroleum might be the best way, but I would highly prefer using green energies and reconstructing the city in order to tackle these issues
- The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps show the change of Petland from 1980 to 2007 82
- The diagram shows the relationship between a number of different languages 72
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
- Nuclear energy 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
Some of the individuals claim that accelerating the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
...his trend, the atmosphere would be much more cleaner and the number of traffic jams would de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29136690647 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07505991464 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546762589928 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.423721666 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174451722064 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624707755028 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512809184932 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113768985422 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406444354978 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.