Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
What other measure do you think might be effective?
In this contemporary period, maintain environment friendly is an important thing that captivated tention of the people. Certainly , it is widely observed that reduce the growing traffic and pollution problems by increasing the price of petrol is a best solution. In my own way of thinking, I partly agree owning to the following reasons.
The widespread usage of personal vehicle is a main point of pollution levels. By increasing the gas cost prevents drivers using their cars which reduce petrol comsumption. Consequently, this act encourage traveller to use the public transports and therefore have chance to reduce the traffic congestions and exhaust fumes. In addition to this, the air quality is under threat by oil spill, by growing the price of petrol, the government encourages people transfer by bicycles to prevents fossil fuels, which leads to energy conservation.
However, one can not deny the drawback which are derived from increasing gasoline. Nowadays, rising price of petrol is a factor behind climbing the cost of transpotation. As a result, this can have a detrimental effect on economy. On the other hand, I belive that using solar-powered is a best way to reduce the global warning because this action using only natural energy. This is necessary for people to habitat conservation and future generations.
In conclution, I would argue that the benefits of increasing price of gas far outweigh the disadvantage. Thus, it may be taken into consideration that alternative energy sources to maintain the habitat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tivated tention of the people. Certainly , it is widely observed that reduce the g...
^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ms by increasing the price of petrol is a best solution. In my own way of thinkin...
^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...d, I belive that using solar-powered is a best way to reduce the global warning b...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31557377049 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00564511222 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610655737705 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0471660696 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6428571429 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160336999419 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516535655264 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049945304471 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957117962152 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350890115697 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.