Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
What other measures do you think might be effective
There is a claim that raising the price of petrol is the best solution to address the growing traffic and pollution problems. I disagree with this statement. In this essay, I will explain my opinions and give possible solutions that might be effective.
Firstly, increasing the price of petrol causes lots of difficulties for the poor. Additionally, no matter how high it is, people still have to go to the workplace, market, etc. This solution makes people more stressed thinking about the best way to conserve money. For example, many people have to eat less, buy fewer clothes and many things to save money on paying petrol’s price. Secondly, if people can buy an expensive car, petrol's price means nothing to them. Although petrol's price growing every day, rich people don’t pay much attention to it, they can afford a car so paying petrol is an easy thing for them.
In my opinion, there are various ways to solve traffic and pollutions problems. Governments should improve the quality of public means of transport, widen knowledge of people about the harms of growing traffic. Moreover, they should give special care to renewable energy such as water, wind. A lot of potential inventors are trying their best to come up with something which can help to address these problems. Those inventors will be more enthusiastic and inspired if governments take notice of them.
To conclude, the demand for committing traffic sympathized. However, we should use solutions that are effective and affect people the least because the reason is protecting the Earth and helping people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a claim that raising the price ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06488549618 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5702444244 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5874131588 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9375 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178363263299 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616522943697 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520196624957 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104956212794 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464051192168 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.