Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Improving the environment is one of the most quintessential tasks of every individual who wants an active lifestyle, however, some people argue that citizens cannot manage anything, only official authorities and colossal organizations can make a difference. I completely disagree with this notion and express my opinion in the following paragraphs with the primary examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, it is indisputable fact that the principal guilty for deteriorating the environment is humanity and only they may overcome this issue with some specific ways which demand lots of intelligence. Mainly because to take care of the environment is not uniquely massive companies or the governments' job, however, it is very essential for also individuals who reside there and if they assist the other organizations which are endeavoring to improve our life progressively, it would be extremely beneficial work. For example, there are a plethora of volunteers and groups which include youngsters who want to contribute to preventing these problems such as global warming, air pollution and etc all over the world. Therefore, every person should think about the environment and assist the government by ascertaining innovative ways for overcoming this issue.
On the other hand, it is irrefutable that the majority of companies and the official authorities perform a crucial role to combat environmental problems. For instance, if scientists and researchers discover creative ways of precluding this controversial argument, global companies invest more money in improving life. Therefore, it is evident that humanity might discover other solutions and carry out researches if they will perform every work by being together with the others.
In conclusion, if the citizens will unite and assist each other, everything is possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 87
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The line graph below shows oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 56
- The diagram shows the relationship between a number of different languages 72
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60498220641 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12685248597 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5290013134 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13292140726 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470999752768 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484279279504 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694765997489 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538883042833 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60498220641 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12685248597 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5290013134 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13292140726 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470999752768 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484279279504 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694765997489 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538883042833 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.