The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People differ greatly in their views about the role of the global community in curtailing the quantity of fossil fuel used in the whole world. From my perspective, I would contend that international collaboration must take urgent actions to guarantee that all countries minimize their usage of fossil fuels.
There are two compelling reasons as to why the international community bears responsibilities for cutting down the consumption of fossil fuels on a global scale. First and foremost, there are problems associated with burning this type of fuel there are global-level environmental degradation problems such as global warming and climate change which a single country cannot combat. Not only does tackling these problems requires the single country to reduce its greenhouse gases emission but it also needs the intergovernmental cooperation which must always play a central role in the resolution of such vast problems. Furthermore, although using environmentally friendly products is an effective way to curb the usage of fossil fuels, third-world countries do not own this renewable energy technology. As a result, industrialized nations should help developing countries to produce this technology.
The duties for minimizing fossil fuel consumption of the global community are immediate because of some reasons. The primary one is that if urgent actions are not taken, the problems of global warming will exert devastating on human life. To explain, the rise of sea level sink many coastal cities and islands in the near future. Another convincing reason is that many sources of fossil fuels around the world are already on the verge of depletion. If there is any measures implemented, the scarcity of energy will create many negative impacts on the development of industries in most countries.
To sum up, the international community play a central role in carrying out the urgent task of curtailing the amount of fossil fuel consumed in the whole world. This is because there are vast environmental problems related to using this energy source which only can be done by the joining efforts of countries, the shortage of non-fossil fuel resources, and the undesirable effect of these issuses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 65
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 78
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Other argue that happiness depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 850, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ult, industrialized nations should help developing countries to produce this technology. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are any measures'?
Suggestion: there are any measures
...e already on the verge of depletion. If there is any measures implemented, the scarcity of energy wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, third, as to, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36599423631 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02162723196 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556195965418 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4637778604 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196297168182 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712255534878 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616395922702 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127175866807 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373070756747 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.