International sporting events such as the Olympic Games and the Football World Cup provide an outlet for patriotic feelings, and help reduce international tensions.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the modern world the sporting events became one of the most popular common entertainments due to the development of digital technologies and television. Many believe that organization or even participation in them can increase the national confidence or improve international relations. Despite this, it is disagreed that there are only bright sides of holding the global championships. Analyzing the realities of political and sovereign interactions will show this.
On the one hand, that kind of popular events requires massive preparation, such as building stadiums, improvement of infrastructure, modernization of security sector ect. and that actions can disclose the facts of monstrous corruption and inefficiency, which could cause the fall of patriotic spirit due to uprising distrust and skepticism about the government steps. For instance, during the construction of main sport facilities for the FIFA World Cup in Russia some cases of large frauds were spotted and the attitude of the majority of Russian citizens was spoiled.
Moreover, some of the so-called “true fans” do not always behave properly with the delegations from the other countries and tourists, as a result, some accidents can reduce the popularity and prestige of the welcoming nation. However, despite the truth that such event can push the development in numerous spheres of life and improvements of the economic environment, it can also lead to some instability inside the country.
On the other hand, is it not a secret that almost all types of popular championships are often used as an instrument of political manipulations. For example, Russian national team had been banned and eventually could not participate in the Olympic Games 2017 beneath the tricolour of the RF, probably due to the aggressive foreign policy of the government. Therefore, sports have also become the way that politics can affect their competitors and satisfy their ambitions. Thus, it makes clear that taking part in global games can noticeably downgrade the respect of the government and nation.
As seen above, reviewing the global situation is not encouraging. Consequently, the global sporting events can notably affect the standards of living and interstate affairs in a negative way. Thus, as the old adage holds true: sport is a competition of persons, but not a contest of systems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
..., modernization of security sector ect. and that actions can disclose the facts of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jority of Russian citizens was spoiled. Moreover, some of the so-called 'tr...
^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...sian citizens was spoiled. Moreover, some of the so-called 'true fans' do not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 174, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ndards of living and interstate affairs in a negative way. Thus, as the old adage holds true: spo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43902439024 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08077044104 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593495934959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2506345137 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16092928459 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438808404341 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236195288339 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802554828545 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263459088189 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.