International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Around the world, the tourism industry has proved beneficial for different places by not only generating good revenue but also creating employment opportunities. Although international tourism has negative influences on local inhabitants and the environment, I still believe that the pros and cons are considered the merits of tourism surpass the demerits.
On the one hand, international tourism is advantageous in many ways. First and foremost, the tourism industry contributes to revenue generation for nations because the more tourists visit, the more profits nations earn. As a result, governments can deal with unemployment and inflation by creating employment in services, such as accommodation, transport, or entertainment. Moreover, the possibilities of cash they obtain can be used and rotated inside the country.
It seems to me that the trend of developing international tourism has many drawbacks, such as the environment and local citizens. The first reason is that unaware visitors intentionally throw rubbish away everywhere in lieu of putting them in public containers giving rise to natural creatures and endangered animals on the verge of disappearance. Therefore, this destruction can bring an enormous burden on the government to deal with the damage. Nevertheless, as many people have gotten into depending on the tourism business, there are times when tourists are not visiting, and the local people find difficulty in earning money for a living then. Finally, with the development of oversea traveling, it can easily happen inflation in the price of goods, amenities, or accommodation.
In conclusion, international tourism has positive and negative impacts, but the merits, such as more income and employment overshadow the demerits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64905660377 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22958908207 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2113668173 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249367500635 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947915145785 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100077695721 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15047036403 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357210795538 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.