International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh disadvantages?
Nowadays, it has become more affordable for transnational travel and nations are welcoming a lot more visitors. Despite some obvious disadvantages of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On one hand, there are two major drawbacks when countries reduce international travel costs and treat tourists with hospitality. Firstly, tourism can have a negative effect on the environment. It creates a greater amount of pollution and waste since more and more people will go there to relax, explore and have fun. The building of facilities and infrastructure, for example, can destroy the habitat of wild animals and natural resources such as beaches. Secondly, a rise in the cost of living strongly affects the locals, in particular, the price of goods, services, and housing may increase dramatically.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits are more significant than such disadvantages. One reason for this view is that mass tourism creates jobs for local people and it also makes their site a more exciting place to live. Particularly, it creates employment in services like accommodation, transport and entertainment, therefore, some areas rely on the number of travellers in order to have their income. Another reason is that it attracts investment from multi-national companies so the standard of living will be improved.
In conclusion, it seems to me that although this may bring several downsides for the natural environment and the locals' lives, the returns are highly justifiable as it helps a country to grow bigger and faster.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2619047619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06135298294 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626984126984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1775021574 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247222605118 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768584031637 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632805503431 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1349687991 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732192903894 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.