Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is agrued that internet innovation means individuals do not need to travel to foreign nation to understand how other people live. From my point of view, i mostly agree with this notion because of its benefits for the citizen life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of modern technology that people have more requirement, so internet technology is hugely significant for the development of the nation. Not only can internet provide a various of valuable knowledge such as academic experience, but also socioeconomic will be narrowed, advancing the economic development. Furthermore, more relationship can be created by the young generation such as international friends and aboad students, transmiting their cutural or historic traditional value which contain numerous helful for their occupation. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Robben Dias, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of postgraduate in New York who use internet technology. The statistic showed that nearly everyone has got a plenty of achevement in their career.
However, we can not negate the drawbacks of this problem for the social. Nowadays, people depend too much on the internet and they have forgot the practical value, harmful influence will be led by this action to the adolesence and young generation. Moreover, Internet technology can not compare with the reality experience which provide deeth knowledge about other countries cuturals.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i totally agree with this statement, but it still have some negative aspect for the teenager. The governemt need to have clear plans for the nation improvement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plenty of achevement in their career. However, we can not negate the drawbacks...
^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'forgotten'.
Suggestion: forgotten
... too much on the internet and they have forgot the practical value, harmful influence ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge about other countries cuturals. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...agree with this statement, but it still have some negative aspect for the teenager. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92193528079 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4928615723 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204767504307 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732250492347 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1352044077 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129753920905 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10640156642 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.