It is discussed that students during they time at college should not live in their household, however, living separated from their parents might benefit them. This essay agrees that advantages of living away from student's homes will benefit college students in their adult life. In this essay I will discuss what benefits might college students get from living separate from their guardians.
College is the milestone in everyones life, it is almost the last step before adulthood and this time period in a life, should prepare young population to their economically productive life. Students entry college in their early teenage age, absolutely unprepared to anything. Particularly without any money handling skills, as in this task their parents had been in charge. Malaysia is the prime example, where students are encouraged to leave their home and study in Kuala Lumpur, where majority of education is happening. Students do not have any other chance than seek a part-time job to cover their living expenses.
Living aside parents also encourage young adults learning houseworks such as cooking, ironing and cleaning. Learning this essential skills for future adulthood is necessary. Teenagers can easily learn how to cook not only local but international cusine as they are more likely surrounded by other national as well as international students. Also, living in share flat does not give them chance to live in a mess, as their flatmates will not accept it. For instance, students in USA live in share house, mainly sharing a room with someone. Living in uncleaned environment might humiliate them in front others.
To sum up, separate from guardians in early adult age benefits students in many ways and undoubtly prepare them for adulthood. In my opinion, living in share flat or share house during studies at college, should be mandatory to everyone.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people assert that sports help to greater extent to build up peace in the world Do you agree or disagree 47
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- What are the causes of water scarcity? What are your solutions? 89
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25333333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57164020293 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0688640844 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371276223867 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124140537403 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965358399142 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215809752489 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960284593603 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.