It is generally accepted that smoking causes the deaths of large number of people. In order to address this problem governments should bans smoking in public places. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the number of people dying from smoking is increasing. Many people think the best way to reduce the number death is banning smoking in public places such as restaurant, park... I agree with opinion at extend some but I think that the government bans smoking in public places is not enough.
On the one hand, smoking is considered to be one of the major causes of the deaths and untreatable diseases such as cancer around the world. So, many people think that government should bans smoking in public places. This is real true. In this case, non-smokers will be able to visit public places without a danger to breathe spoiled air because many researches suggest that non-smokers are also put in a danger by the poisonous smoke of the tobacco which people breathe trough their lungs. In addition, smoking in public places is a bad image for children, they can mimic adults smoking without knowing the dangers that cigarettes bring.
On the other hand, I believe the government bans smoking in public places is not enough for everyone. The main problem is that it depends on each person's consciousness. People can find an appropriate place and suitable time for smoking such as they can smoke in the home or restroom. So, it would be waste of time banning smoking in public places because smokers continue smoking. The government should introduce more law to stop smoking such as smoking age limits or banning the production and sale of cigarettes in the country.
In conclusion, banning smoking in public places is not the best way to reduce smoking. However, this reform can be beneficial for the non-smokers whose health can be protected by the measures of the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'ban'
Suggestion: ban
...any people think that government should bans smoking in public places. This is real ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...main problem is that it depends on each persons consciousness. People can find an appro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...production and sale of cigarettes in the country. In conclusion, banning smoking...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87456445993 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55111757879 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484320557491 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2594273172 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319837028786 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134349927313 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711830398569 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213140553329 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666950864025 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.