It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whether or not having talent means everything is true has been remained an unsolved dilemma. Some believe it is quintessentially vital for becoming a well-known sports star or a musician. On the flip side, its role in succession is regarded to be significantly less important. Both bright and dark sides of this heated argument will be discussed in the present essay and followed up with my opinion.
It is often suggested that inherited gifts are meritorious for myriad reasons, the first of which is that they can be taught much faster than their peers. As an illustration, the tall gene's presence is more likely to predispose a basketball player to become famous more easily than other shorter players. The second is that since they learn different skills faster than others due to their certain abilities, they have more time to practice, which is necessary for success. For instance, they can learn, memorize, and perform musical notes faster, better, and more delightful than others.
Turning to another side of the debate, most people have been accepting this quotation: Talent is not everything. First and foremost, it is true that it can be useful for turning to the champion, but it is not the only item needed. Although innate talent cannot be taught, have an expert teacher, which can broaden your horizons faster or guiding you around the clock, which entails colossal achievements, is also vital. Secondly, sometimes a child will be born with some extra barriers to tackle, such as blindness or deafness. The chief among the examples is Helen Keller, born without the ability to see or hear anything. However, with the perseverance of her great tutor, she becomes an eminent writer. Broadly, these examples would impose some constraints on the place of talent for progress.
By way of a conclusion, even though it is true that some specific groups of community prevalently hold the position of talent as a solely needed item for becoming superstars, I believe that every individual can be nurtured and turned into a good sports person or musician.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-26 | AnnaAlysia | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-03 | annaalysia007 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | writingme | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Trinh Bella | 80 | view |
- What are the pros and cons of children watching television 84
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working from home 84
- Most of the world s poor live in countries where tourism is a growing industry The issue is that tourism does not benefit the poorest How can the income generated by tourism benefit the poor Give reasons for your answer 96
- These days people work in more than one job and often change careers several times during their life what are the advantages and disadvantages of this 78
- How do you think society will be affected by the growth of telecommuting 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not having talent means everything i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not having talent means everything is true ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02040816327 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68404044917 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0204627607 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354354013714 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100431735587 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718733752243 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201474853509 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465606530118 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.