School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely accepted that teachers play a pivotal role in our children's lives. What one should consider is their significant positive effects in both social and intellectual aspects of development. I wholeheartedly believe teachers as a leading role in the mentioned areas. The heated debate will be discussed in this essay and followed by some viable examples.
I think teachers' position is meritorious for myriad reasons, the first of which is that they are trained professionally by the pedagogical experts to understand different ways of upbringing kids. As an illustration, they can sift the information and explain the material with numerous approaches, like songs, plays, or even stories. Not only will it absorb better by students, but it also makes them ponder about the elements that are taught to them. It simply entails a better and faster understanding of basic knowledge.
The second is that kids' social abilities will be enhanced dramatically by playing with their peers in the school situation and under a teacher's supervision to minimize the negative peer pressures, like bullying each other. Undeniably, these qualities cannot be taught by any parents in the home environment. For instance, they can learn to share, give, and make firm-friendships.
However, it might be argued by some people that parents are the best role model for their offsprings since they love them more than others. It might not be true for many causes. The chief among them is that due to the bad economic situation in many parts of the globe, including my own country, dual-income families become a norm. They have to work around the clock from dawn till dusk to meet their ends meet. There is not no much time left, with this attitude, for parents to nurture their children and help them to progress.
By way of a conclusion, even though we all believe that parents might provide kids a useful source by which they can progress, I claim that teachers are more responsible for children's social and intellectual development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ers in the school situation and under a teachers supervision to minimize the negative pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 424, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...k to meet their ends meet. There is not no much time left, with this attitude, for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05688622754 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84985435312 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595808383234 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6130353419 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3529411765 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183055809668 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510868690518 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537156770632 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105667906138 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548999739547 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.