it is a good thing if senior management worker in a company get a much higher salary than other worker in the same company do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, the salary ratio is a debatable topic for every employer. The employers who are doing job in senior management post, they get a higher salary as compared to other workers. This essay will explain why it is a reasonable deal to provide more salary to senior managers. It is described in the following paragraphs.
To starts with, There are plenty of reasons which indicate it is a valuable deal. First and foremost, The responsibility of the senior manager is far more than ordinary workers. The handling of the company or factory is all up to the managers head so, empowering high paid is necessary. Also, the senior manager is the main factor for company success. For example, Google is the most profitable company in the world because of senior managers and their salary policy.
Moreover, the senior managers have a difficult task, that is a taking decision for their industry's bright future. And, workers have only followed their manager instruction therefore senior managers have lots of workload, which lead them for higher paid. For example, D-mart provides a higher salary to their senior managers because they made all the plans for their product.
To conclude, it is a good thing to encourage senior managers with high paid because their responsibility and workload are high as compared to other workers. All in all, companies should provide a reasonable amount to their managers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-25 | Kishanpatel | 84 | view |
- in many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problem do you think youth unemployed causes for individual and society What may the store be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 78
- it is now possible for scientist and tourist to travel to remote natural environment such as south pole Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Adult youth are often call up for working for the development of communities some people say they should work volunteer where as other say that they should get paid discuss both the views and give your opinion 61
- The charts below show the consumption of water for a different purpose in Australia and Residential water use in Australia in 2004 74
- today the life expectancy of people is much higher than before some people think that older people should continue to be involved in the workforce to what extent do you agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun workload seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of workloads'.
Suggestion: lots of workloads
...truction therefore senior managers have lots of workload, which lead them for higher paid. For e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06034482759 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63909992133 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521551724138 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5607296035 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8571428571 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293908718109 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102447055899 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677655452358 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180134331375 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308573635674 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.