It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor public spaces such as squared and parks.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many citizens are of the opinion that there should be the appearance of public parks and squares in every town and cities. From my perspective, while I agree with this view, I also believe that other issues are of great importance.
There are certain benefits of investing in parks and squares. First and foremost, it is essential to provide local residents with those places for the sake of improving public health. In reality, the majority of employees are dealing with hectic work schedules on a regular basis in order to cover their daily expenses. For that reason, having such places gives them an opportunity to breathe some fresh air and organize outdoor activities to boost their mental health. Secondly, if squares are built, local inhabitants are likely to have more interaction with others. Nguyen Hue walking street located in Ho Chi Minh City is a typical example. In general, social events are frequently held there, which allows them to widen their social circle with those who have similar interests.
On the other hand, constructing parks and squares has an unavoidable impact on the national economy, therefore, local authorities are advised to take this issue into account. Instead of spending a large amount of money on maintenance annually, governments should make investments in building more housing areas and improving traffic infrastructure and provide financial support to disadvantaged people in unpredictable situations such as floods or Covid-19 pandemic.
In conclusion, as far as I am concerned, the construction of parks and squares in towns or cities brings some obvious benefits as mentioned above, governments also need to consider some other aspects of life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-12-05 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
2020-11-01 | dthuy1810 | 73 | view |
2020-10-11 | tramtram0407 | 89 | view |
- The charts show the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 75
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK 76
- The line graph below provide information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010 91
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30996309963 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79821120989 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6028522807 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261555521862 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812544298699 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361523418115 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137624371169 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438079656147 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.