From my own perspective, I strongly agree for giving some punishments to children. However, adults must understand that there are several punishments which adversely affect a child’s psychological condition.
The purpose of punishment is helping children to control their behaviors so that they act according to their ideas of what is right and wrong, not because they are afraid of it. Basically, there are four kinds of punishment : physical punishment, verbal punishment, withholding rewards, and penalties. The first two kinds of punishment, physical and verbal, are not considered to be effective discipline methods. The other two, withholding rewards and giving penalties, can be used either as effective discipline methods or as punishment depending on how parents administer them.
Parents and teachers who use physical punishment are setting an example of using violence to settle problems or conflicts. When parents use this kind of punishment, children will imitate them and use violent act to settle their conflicts with others. Moreover, it makes the child hate himself and others. Harsh physical punishment and verbal abuse can never be justified as ways to dicipline children. Same with physical punishment, verbal abuse hurts the child’s self concept.
As conclusion, letting children experience the consequences of their decisions is better way to discipline young people. Children learn from experiences, just like adults. Parents should tell the child, before it happens, what the consequences are for breaking a rule. The child also needs to know the reason for the consequence; for example, it is extra work to keep food warm and inconsiderate of other family members.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56538461538 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98222643188 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603846153846 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8010552296 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225230390869 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694294596014 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474355635406 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125261779387 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00576966629766 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.