It is important to have huge public spaces like parks and squares in towns and cities. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement?
There has been some discussion about the existence and need of parks and squares in towns and cities. While some people believe that these open premises are essential, others insist that these places make the land useless and hence they must be converted to practical purposes. In my opinion, despite the voices against the larger public places, parks and squares provide great value to both the towns and its civilians.
First of all, the open areas have always been considered as the heart of cities, where people get together for meetings and leisure activities. Besides that children and their parents spend quality time at these places after their hectic daily schedules. The increasing pollution in cities is a cause of great concern for the government and the citizens and places like parks and squares often provide relaxation to the old people. Moreover, such places attract tourists as they usually have a history behind their creation. For instance, all European towns are famous for their beautiful gardens and city centre squares. Thus, it’s absolutely imperative to conserve them for the future generations.
On the other hand, one can’t deny the fact that cities are getting crowded each day and lacking places to build public and commercial centres. New transportation systems are coming to the cities and they need a large space to build stations and wider lanes. For example, New York was planned nearly two hundred years ago and the roads in the city were small and narrow which were built for carts not for cars and buses. Later, New York city authority converted many historical parks and gardens into parking stations and highways. This transformation was publicly criticized by civilians and other town planners. Therefore, destroying parks and other public places for current benefits is not the solution for space constraints in cities.
In conclusion, big public grounds are the need of our future generations. Cities are facing a lot of pressure to develop a substantial infrastructure for the growing population, but this cannot be allowed at the cost of parks and squares. Therefore, it’s completely indispensable to have huge social places in the cities and towns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | Hoangquan0912 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Hoangquan0912 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Hoangquan0912 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | code6127 | 67 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the paragraph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
- Wild animals have no place in 21st century Some people think that preventing these animals from dying out is a waste of resource To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are great needs while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5674190499 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574229691877 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8411816151 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.944444444 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204334969531 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683929232442 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468705547544 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126881522085 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181001044987 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.