Some opinions assume that governments should only allocate resources on taking care of their own residents because helping all needy people globally is impossible. I totally disagree with this statement because we have some reasons why governments should share the burden of global responsibility together.
In terms of transporting advantages, it is nowadays possible to take place aid-purpose transportation quickly and efficiently more than before,.thanks to the availability of modern means of transportation. For example, governments can send a huge amount of aid goods to even every remote corner of the world by plane. Furthermore, the surge in establishing NGOs all over the world is a beneficial motivation to promote relief activities. These such organisations make charities become more easier and more accessible when someone wants to contribute money or force to support poorer countries. WHO is a typical example, which provides volunteers with a diverse range of meaningful charity.
From a perspective of social responsibility, although authorities absolutely have to be accountable for their own citizens, there are many moral reasons why governments should share a common humanity. We sometimes have to face some setbacks which have no geographical boundaries and governments should recognise their international obligations. For instance, humans today are confronting with many serious consequences caused by covid-19 pandemic, in which international collaborations should be taken into consideration rather than solving by separating individuals.
In conclusion, I completely disagree that governments should merely concentrate on people in their own countries due to both technological and moral reasons, so they should fulfil their international obligations to needy people when possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...quickly and efficiently more than before,.thanks to the availability of modern mea...
^^
Line 2, column 486, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...uch organisations make charities become more easier and more accessible when someone wants ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93129770992 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42499782545 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652671755725 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7488653158 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271189330295 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921638205581 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10540125076 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177667772713 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110288284665 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.