It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Extinction is usually seen as an inevitable natural event for a certain species; therefore, to some people, it is of no use preserving endangered species. However, I disagree with the statement, and this essay will explain the role of humanity in this destructive process.
To begin with, humans are responsible for the significant numerical decrease of certain animals. Industrial activities and deforestation often underlie habitat loss, which then leads to disappearance of local species. Additionally, it is residential chemicals that contaminates water cycle to be essential for wild animals living nearby. Meanwhile, some have been pushed to the edge of extinction due to poaching. Take the rhino as an example, in the last one hundred years, hunters killed these animals illegally in search of their expensive horns, making their total number reduced sharply, or even a biological extinction (in which one kind cannot produce new offspring) for the white rhinos. Although human did not entirely cause extinction, we accelerated it. Therefore, the human must take the duty to preserve the alive species.
Besides, wildlife preservation has positive effect to natural environment. Firstly, if several species disappeared, the food chain would be severely afflicted. This can result in considerable decrease in food output among rural communities. For instance, in China, farmers used to kill millions birds that had eaten their crops. However, this allowed pest and insects to grow up freely, which then finally led to famine in a wide scale. It is apparent that biodiversity is connected to residential activities. Accordingly, protections are sorely needed.
In conclusion, I believe humans have to prevent extinction at any scale, because it is not only responsible but also the way to protect the human race in the long run. Instead of treating preservation as an atonement, individuals and establishments should take it as a mutual mission.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Extinction is usually seen as an inevita...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48844884488 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05609135424 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663366336634 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6342789766 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3888888889 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140905987303 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353442279894 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322169712275 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872364915958 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417200469304 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.