It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the disappearance of living creatures is natural, humans, thereby, do not need to intervene in this process. I somewhat object to the notion as the survival of myriads of animals are correlated with the well-being of humans and ecological equilibrium, even though there are few animals may not worth persserving.
The first reason why I advocate the prevention of endangered spieces is that it merits humanity. Animals play an important role in making up the well-fare of people as food sources, materials, or instincts that can be indirectly translated in humans benefits such as pollinating vegetation, decomposing soil, and purifying water. If the animals are lost, the humans’ living standards and even existence would be placed at risk.
Another point in support of conserving threatened spieces is that it maintains biodiversity. All animals are more or less related altogether in the food chain. The death of a spieces would put its predators at the brink of extinction, or enable its prey to proliferate. In both circumstances, the food chain would be disrupted, and the natural habitat stands a higher chances of collapsing, posing a threat to the flourishment of other flora and fauna.
Admittedly, there are some occasions when the death of certain spieces may not harm the environment and humans. To illustrate, some rare snakes do not possess qualities that compesate for protection effort. Even though they can hunt rodents that destroying crops, the preservation of them does not make any significant difference for the nature and wealth of humankind. In this case, the lives of the reptiles are not worthy of people’s concern.
In summary, I mostly disagree with the view that humans should not intefere in the loss of animal spieces. Although few living species such as exotic snakes which hardly sustain the natural environment, the majority of animals are of great importance to the natural balance and humanity.y
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, the humans’ living standards and even existence would be placed at risk. Ano...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, well, in summary, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21202531646 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94179741106 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3989898884 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179425907924 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547680237668 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395370442006 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932496272454 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375682510712 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.