It is argued that people should not interfere in the extinction of animal creatures because it is considered a natural process. While some people agree with this statement to some extent, I have the opposite opinion.
On the one hand, the primary reason why proponents support the former is that the changes in the environment can lead to the deaths of some animals, which is deemed impossible to be put under control by human beings. For example, ashes from volcanic eruptions millions of years ago covered the sky for a prolonged time, preventing sunlight from warming the Earth, leading to unprecedented decreasing temperatures. As a result, almost all dinosaurs have been wiped out until now.
On the other hand, I believe human beings play an important role in the vanishment of several animals. The first one is that overhunting campaigns can lead some animals to either the edge of extinction or become endangered. For instance, due to customers’ ever-increasing demands on ivory, the increased number of African elephants has been killed by illegal hunters, contributing to the extinction of several kinds of elephants. Secondly, tremendous amounts of carbon emissions have been released into the atmosphere because of the overuse of fossil fuels by vehicles and factories. As a result, global warming comes as a consequence that has led to ice melts in two poles that pose the vanishment of creatures living there like a penguin.
In conclusion, I believe human beings should be responsible for the extinction of some animal species. In the future, actions must be taken as soon as possible to handle the problem mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13432835821 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88888876989 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608208955224 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9105068504 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201222861982 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663485248304 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689721752051 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122379900289 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628065806464 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.