It is believed that educational certificates invariably result in success, while others state that these certificates are not equivalent to success. From my perspective, although the latter has its reasons, I agree with the former.
On the one hand, it is common sense these days that educational qualifications cannot ensure personal and career success. Because of the economic crisis in many parts of the world, a great number of companies end up laying off a significant proportion of their employees. This outcome escalates the unemployment rates in developing countries. It is tricky for a graduate to get a suitable job with a lucrative income. This reality reinforces the idea that educational certificates cannot bring success. As a result, those possessing educational certificates must be outstanding to swiftly adapt to another role dedicated to achieving success.
On the other hand, I believe that educational certificates play a pivotal role in one’s success. This happens because a wide range of jobs require their candidates to have at least a bachelor’s degree. This occurrence strengthens the paramount significance of educational qualifications, especially in a rapidly changing market where the unemployed consistently increase. The presence of these qualifications helps recruiters determine competent candidates who possess the necessary skills and expertise. Hence, the candidates will most likely obtain a great offer with a lucrative income, presumably ensuring their occupational prosperity.
In conclusion, although numerous graduates are struggling to find a job matching their expectations because of the current economic crisis, many recruiters can ensure personal and career success for outstanding graduates who can perform the tasks successfully.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, while, at least, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82061068702 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31333105718 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606870229008 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6987250076 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155049977415 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583269775426 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732229068628 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993507997124 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05211226481 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.