some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and homeless people do you agree or disagree

In the modern world, many people are willing to help disadvantaged people, as these individuals cannot survive without the assistance of the rich and affluent people. However, others feel that there are should not be any assistance, as people should run their livelihood by themselves. Personally, I believe that poor people should be motivated by the authorities.
On the one hand, it is true that the main cause of this problem is unemployment. In this regard, many cannot afford many things. Furthermore, economic instability is the second reason why many citizens are not able to earn money. To illustrate, due to the high prices of properties, some people are living in the streets. Thirdly, the process of globalization has caused many problems for unskilled people, as big companies and organizations are willing to employ a well-qualified worker.
On the other hand, it is clear that there are some people who are not keen to provide support for the unemployed and homeless people. They tend to think that the government should concentrate on other challenges such as health care and education. Moreover, some people believe that if the authorities provide the support for these people, they will not start working, as they are not willing to earn money. For instance, many people who have no property, are indolent people.
In conclusion, although many people reckon to think that there is no point to support these people, others feel that the government should take care of these people. In this case, I believe that the government should provide the job for these individuals. Accordingly, they should take up working, as they are supposed to earn money for their family and relatives.

Votes
Average: 4.8 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09677419355 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80003798927 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2361831198 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295081234515 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106835654352 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796628520513 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191113779476 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804783671488 0.056905535591 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.