It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary world, opinions are divided as to whether human should interfere the natural procedures to save animals from extinction. While there are some reasons to support the view that people should not take actions, I believe that preserving animals is of fundamental importance.
On the one hand, it is comprehensible why some people denounce/censure the protection of faunas against extinction. Firstly, the natural process is intertwined with the progression of the evolution of all species. Specifically, natural selection plays a role in preserving the most adaptable and developed species and eradicating inferior ones , which leads to the development of the world and creates an advanced society. Therefore, when exerting themselves to put a halt to this process, people are coercing themselves to live in a primitive and uncivilized society. Secondly, when humans prevent this procedure from accelerating, there will not be adequate basic needs for all species to coexist harmoniously. For instance, if carnivore dinosaurs were resurrected in the 21st century, they would feed on humans due to the shortage of edible sources in the contemporary era.
On the other hand, I believe that the responsibility for preventing animals from disappearance should devolve on human-beings. To begin with, the diversity of animals plays a pivotal role in maintaining the existence of all species and humans are not an exception. For example, in a food chain, when a small organism such as frog is exterminated, correlative consumers of this animal like snakes, hawks and even humans would experience a dearth of food, leading to the extinction of these species. Another reason worthy of consideration is that were it not for the natural preservation, humans’ technological advances related to this field would not be innovated to figure out the enduring solution for ecological problems. Particularly, there are now some state-of-the-art machines that are able to purify the atmosphere and restore the pristine habitats of endangered species including rhinos and pandas.
In conclusion, though there are some benefits of shirking the responsibility to protect fauna species, it is not to say that preventing natural process from taking place does not have any redeeming features.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ontemporary world, opinions are divided as to whether human should interfere the natural proc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral selection plays a role in preserving the most adaptable and developed species...
^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed species and eradicating inferior ones , which leads to the development of the w...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e does not have any redeeming features.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51841359773 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24168758749 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560906515581 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2427482803 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.142857143 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280981224749 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912390859708 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397314517551 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1633273692 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361026949988 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.