It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many argue that it is impossible and useless for a nation to furnish universities for a high proportion of youngsters. I completely agree with this opinion.
Governments will certainly face difficulties if they make an effort to generate enough colleges for enormous juveniles. Firstly, the cost of building and running sufficiently these colleges to educate the increased number of students would be prohibitive because spending money on constructing immense universities without concerning about quality education is a waste of money. Secondly, entry standards would have to be lowered from students' present levels, making it easy for the youth to achieve the entrance grades. As a result, the standard of university education would be lowered. This phenomenon in Viet Nam recent years has resulted in a sharp decrease in the average entrance grades, which could be taken as a particularly salient example of this.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why engendering a huge of universities is not useful. One reason is that job assignment is necessary to exist in our society. Consequently, students should be taught plausible knowledge to apply for their jobs and assist them to be better equipped and confident to handle their job assignments. Furthermore, vocational training is essential to have a workforce with professional and practical skills. A good example of this case is that young people should be trained in vocational training centers if they tend to become construction workers, agricultural, nurse and so on instead of joining courses in universities.
In conclusion, I would argue that it is not feasible for a country to provide enough colleges for the youth.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32462686567 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07667977762 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1861970155 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.769230769 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162369766984 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618172438146 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774359533566 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143299104667 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090021293373 0.056905535591 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.