It is often claimed that electronic devices will soon replace paper books.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, the development of technology has exerted a far-reaching impact on superseding traditional books. In my perspective, I completely agree with this opinion due to its data storage capacity and convenience.
When it comes to electronic devices’ benefits, its high data store optimizes users’ experience. So far the more books there are, the bigger the bookshelf is. With the development of technology, data storage can solve this problem easily. For instance, for people who do not have a large house to contain a big bookshelf, data storage is a good solution with just a tiny amount of money to expand data in saving books. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to claim that technology has offered people infinite storage space.
Another benefit of electronic devices is the convenience it brings. In this modern age, almost everybody has their own smartphone or laptop side by side. It means that people can easily access or change devices anywhere, at any time. Moreover, people can carry one device, instead of bringing myriad books with them. For instance, if people want to drink and read books simultaneously at a coffee shop, electronic devices like smartphones can help them read books easily without carrying a bag to contain books. In this way, people can lessen the weight of their bags when going out.
In conclusion, electronic tools have played a pivotal role in human life by their convenience and a high datastore of devices. In the future, electronic devices will soon replace paper books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nience and a high datastore of devices. In the future, electronic devices will soo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8054853946 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5362167318 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191324940521 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070113790239 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103008596203 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117684066614 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832050602986 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.