It is true that recruitment requirements vary. While some people believe that potential candidates should be creative and independent, the others argue that they should have team working skill and work follow instructions. This essay will discuss both points of views.
Innovative and independent employees and can handle easier a various of unintended situations might occur during their work. It is evident that many workers have to face problems with different levels of complexity; a productive and efficient employee should actively research about causes and solutions of problems before bringing it up for discussion; it is also a great method of self-studying and improvement. In the big picture of modern economic, products' assessment currently significantly depends on its creative value, particularly with high technology devices; therefore, many companies nowadays prefer innovative candidates.
On the other hand, businesses usually have their own process in management employees' tasks, which requires the cooperation not only between individuals but also departments. Hence, employees, who have their own role in a team, should work efficiently together with the other members with different roles. Moreover, companies' instructions are vital to follow to make sure that those processes work properly and smoothly.
In conclusion, recruitment is an essential process of any business; therefore, consideration of candidates who are innovative and indepedent workers or who are good at working in a team and following instructions are necessary. From my point of view, which quality from candidates more important depends on many factors from working environment and job requirements; therefore, recruitment should base on particular needs of each company.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86301369863 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18343772763 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657534246575 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.248225955 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.5 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186994852073 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787391429566 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415993285691 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12597287089 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045486575599 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.