Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

It is true that, in this contemporary era, new informations are being taken by people but it does not mean that we would not gain any acquaintance about our past. According to my perspective, learning or attaining some knowledge from our past events it is essential for us.

To start with, there are few points that why past values are necessary for us. Firstly, when we identify that we are totally wrong in this point in our past so definately we would improve ourselves in our present as well as future. Secondly, learning about histories of our country's as well as past culture it gives us satisfaction. Thirdly, we know that all things are done by our freedom fighters. We should know about them.
For example, first I had got only 4.5 bands in my writing but after that I started working hard on my writing skills and taken some experience from my past. In addition, that is why right now I am able to write anything without any single mistake.

Looking at the other view, we have lots of different knowledge and all things for learning. Furthermore, time is given by people for acquiring new skills and know about different technologies. It may be not good for learning about past in this modern era. For instance, when people would go for interview at that time companies would ask all the things related to current situations or knowledge rather than past.

On a concluding note, undoubtedly present knowledge is also important for all people because it is important for our present yet, we must understand that learning from past would always beneficial for us. We do not think to do our past mistake in our present and we should take some knowledge about past as well. Past values are more essential than anything.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, it is true, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72937293729 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58938182055 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518151815182 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7451534921 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5625 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21130262116 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873995801397 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588104592316 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130658387019 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630436983165 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, it is true, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72937293729 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58938182055 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518151815182 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7451534921 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5625 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21130262116 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873995801397 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588104592316 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130658387019 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630436983165 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.