As life expectancy is increasing, people work after retirement with pay. Alternatively, some people start to work at a young age. Are these positive or negative impacts?
Recent decades have witnessed the upwards spectrum in the number of people working after retirement with pay as well as people working at the young age. Although the advantages associated with this pattern could be pronounced, the downsides could justify these.
It should be acknowledged that embarking on careers after retirement could lead to both positive and negative impacts. On the one hand, Working after retirement acts as an incentive for the increase in the monthly incomes, minimizing their overreliance on a pension which is invariably associated with an insignificant amount. On the other hand, elderly individuals could be susceptible to some diseases stemming from the ageing process such as senile dementia or Arthritis. Subsequently, their likelihood of low effective working performance is inevitably or they are prone to some injuries or even fatality when it comes to excessively strength demanding jobs.
Obviously, working at the young age could be fraught with both upsides and downsides on an even platform. Specifically, Stable health and dynamic and flexible characteristics enable young people to apply for various occupations based on their personal preferences, thereby knowing what jobs are really compatible with academic capacity and intrinsic aptitude, promoting their career prospects in the future. In contrast, Young individuals could be conducive to the deficiency in working experience and social skills such as diplomatic or management ones. This would prevent from gratifying some job specifications, pushing them to the brink of unemployment.
In conclusion, These two trends could bestow both positive and negative effects on an equal level. However, individuals irrespective of ages should take some factors related to the health condition or working experience into consideration to guarantee the best working performance for the long-term career development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, really, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74647887324 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08674913689 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595070422535 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7047698232 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345158776535 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123636775323 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108914020086 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226454948231 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864804333681 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.