Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
International integration is the currently rising trend in the modern world which raises the question if accommodating in foreign nations where their official languages are required is beneficial for non-native speakers or it can be seriously problematic in social and occupational terms. Although advantages can be seen clearly, I believe that those negative situations are worth concerning.
There is an obvious reason why people believe that staying abroad is beneficial in some ways. People who live in another country with a different language are standing a good chance of experiencing culture sharing and technological evolution. As a result, exploration of the unique traditions is necessary and alongside, unforgettable memories are clearly noteworthy. In terms of technological adaptation in every aspect of life, especially in some western countries, staying overseas definitely means a higher living standard.
In contrast, I believe that some serious cases not only occur frequently but also affect people's lives massively in social and career status. To begin, living abroad is usually associated with social racism since there are invisible cultural barriers and differences in the way of thinking. Consequently, people accommodating in foreign countries are likely to become victims of violence, bullying and isolation. The example can be seen clearly in case of the Covid 19 pandemic when the number of Asians in Europe witnessing social racism has been recorded significantly high. Secondly, in terms of practical problems, the most common ones are job promotion. According to research in South America, there is a preference for higher positions for native employees which is similar to becoming less competitive for non-native residents, they just make efforts for a dead-end job.
To put in a nutshell, although benefits of living abroad are undeniable, there are several disadvantages, from my perspective, that are considered to outweigh the advantages. I suggest that entities regardless of organizations or governments should establish adequate policies to ensure the rights of non-native employees as global citizens.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70093457944 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15290346569 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632398753894 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0762235511 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.714285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133070339549 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418742099381 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377317579049 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720912394475 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360789646281 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.