living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems, as well as practical problems.
TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENTЕ?
SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT LIVING A OVERSEAS COUNTRY RELATES SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS WHICH OCCUR BOTH PRACTICAL AND SOCIAL SITUATION DUE TO LANGUAGE BARRIER. I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH THIS ISSUE AND THINK THAT LIVING IN THAT WAY HAS SEVERAL MAIN ISSUES.
IN THE FIRST HALF OF 2016, I WAS LIVING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN ORDER TO STUDY LANGUAGE PREPARATION COURSE CALLED ENGLISH AS SECOND LANGUAGE. AT THAT TIME, MY ENGLISH LANGUAGE ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH FOREIGN PEOPLE WAS VERY WEAK COMPARED TO NOW. BECAUSE OF THIS CONDITION, I ENCOUNTERED WITH COMMUNICATION WHEN I WENT OUT AND PARTICIPATED SOCIAL ACTIVITIES. ALSO, I SEE SOME FOREIGN PEOPLE HAD PROBLEM SAME THAT HAD ME.
SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT LIVING A FOREIGN COUNTRY TO WORK IS BETTER THAN LIVING HOME COUNTRY. HOWEVER I THINK THAT WORKING IN A OVERSEAS WITHOUT KNOWING WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT EVEN EARNING MORE MONEY THAN HOME COUNTRY. FOR EXAMPLE, MANY MONGOLIANS LIVING IN SOUTH KOREA WITH BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL. IT IS VERY DIFFICULT FOR THOSE WHO LIVE ILLEGALLY TO GET PUBLIC SERVICES SUCH AS MEDICAL TREATMENT, EMERGENCY AIDS, SERVICES OF POLICE ETC.
FINALLY, I WOULD SAY IT WILL BE BETTER BY STUDYING LANGUAGE WHICH IS MAINLY SPOKEN IN A COUNTRY WHICH ATTRACTED SOMEONE TO LIVE, WORK OR STUDY. THUS WE NEED TO DETERMINE OUR FUTURE GOALS CORRECTLY AS EARLY AS WHEN WE WERE YOUNG CHILDREN. TO ACHIEVE GOOD EDUCATION FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE, THERE SHOULD BE PROGRAMS WHICH GIVE PEOPLE PROPERLY ABILITIES TO COMMUNICATE WITHOUT ANY DIFFICULTY. BY DOING SO, PROBLEMS OCCURRED TO PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY WILL BE MITIGATED.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: HOWEVER,
...ORK IS BETTER THAN LIVING HOME COUNTRY. HOWEVER I THINK THAT WORKING IN A OVERSEAS WITH...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: THUS,
...TRACTED SOMEONE TO LIVE, WORK OR STUDY. THUS WE NEED TO DETERMINE OUR FUTURE GOALS C...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05283018868 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59153811003 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8341492551 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159244657671 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607280859348 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04228407564 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105561533111 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306018427471 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.