Living in large cities today poses many problems for people.
What are these problems? Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns?
Does total urbanization introduce more obstacles than solutions to the everyday routine of citizens? It is an open secret that hustle and bustle of metropolitan cities could put the nerve system of people under a lot of pressure while nature of the rural areas can nurture the positivity and stress-free mind. Thus, some experts claim that metapolicies create a vast majority of troubles such, as traffic jams and shortage of residential space. One possible solution to ease the cause and effect of the mentioned issue is to propose governmental incentives with the aim to motivate citizen to migrate to urban, unpopulated regions.
The cost of living in the big cities is increasing dramatically over the past few decades, since more and more people move to well-developed areas with advanced economies to pursue the dream of better life. The straightforward result is that there appear issues connected with environmental situation, air pollution, overpopulation, and lack of housing. Taking a deeper look, one can conclude that traffic is one of the greatest issues. For example, in Moscow or New York it could take more that 5 hours to commute to work in rush hours, while in Mumbai people can hardy drive at all, as lots of different vehicles are at roads at once making it impossible. What is more, overpopulation creates peaked demand for rental and personal housing, while supply cannot satisfy 100 percent of desired. This fact does definitely not ease the problem with the poor living in slumps. An instance is Mexico City, where people as a rule live without proper sanitation and needed facilities.
The only solution is the introduction of governmental incentives to encourage people to move to some less populated regions. One proposition is to smoothly motivate citizens to follow downshifting schemes by creating smart advertising and street banners with the message stating the advantages of rural areas. The second path is investment in rural infrastructure, such as well-planned school facilities, improved medicine and healthcare, and more importantly housing options. It is evident that the aforementioned transformations will encourage people not to move to big cities or even will stimulate citizens to migrate to far-fetched areas with intact nature and low level of stress.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that living in a large city brings many advantages. However, the citizens today are dealing with countless problems in their routine life. Therefore, I personally believe that the government should encourage them to migrate to smaller towns by building more facilities to attract them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30528846154 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00758621536 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8409466131 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.611111111 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286643240989 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760047184837 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655617470196 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169694616952 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105200030346 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.