local
The theme of comparing the importance between learning local history and world’s history always makes few debating, some point of view assume that studying hometown's history is more necessary than finding out the world’s history. Analyzing on some aspect, I partly agree with that opinion.
The benefit from finding out the local history is shown very clearly. Firstly, inhabitant can be taking a pride about their cultural county after revealing the period of previous time that their hometown had to experience. It is useful for people to increase and reinforce their patriotism, also ready for improving the country. Secondly, Local history do wonder for people to understand the thing that can be relevant to their own surroundings. For example, they can discover about the developmental history of local government, how to generation their city or the way that their familiar food was born. Another important thing, they need to find out the local history to introduce with international friends as a way to denote the hospitality when the foreign friends put an attention for our culture.
On the other hand, It can be denied the dispensable role of learning world’s history. It provides to people an insight in many ways about their lives, hence developing their common knowledge. Besides, cultivating in other cultural history make people easy to empathize with the new environment. A typical example of it, there is an enormous benefit for immigrant people who intend arriving at foreign countries like easily communicating or preventing the misunderstanding. Additionally, It is also a great way for people who want to have a deep insight into the generation of the important event or invention such as the affair of world war or the conventional event.
In conclusion, local history and world’s history have their individual benefit so it is necessary for people to find out both of them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94182899189 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8912907027 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166522996125 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071296520838 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865969532668 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117686861827 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771640515482 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.