Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that information technology has risen dramatically to replace bookmobiles and there by spending money for library will be wasted. Computer science has spectacular advances in book saving with short space, however, I strongly disagree with the statement because, library has ample benefits to the society especially students. Firstly, this essay will discuss about how library would make changes in people and the importance of funding, followed by the analysis of innovative device limit.
Libraries are important cornerstone of a healthy community and out coming generations. College students often used for public wagon for reference resources with flexible space for group discussion. People with prevalent habit of reading could introduce familiar authors and learners life through discuss in library. Moreover, make use of library visit would help to know the antique books, and pristine letters associated with changes of word journey. For example, librarian would help to the customers to differentiate path way of books and arrangement criteria as per the order of system.
In order to think about computer applications may have wide range of memory and storage capacity as compared to bookcases. Nevertheless, usage of such devices must have an internet connection and power supply at any time. Well wishers might have original software and links for the certain books. Irrespective of information super high way, law class community could not afford the price and material for online readings. Furthermore, some languages cannot apply for gadgets to read like, local traditional languages because, most of the computer applications are English. For instance, India has many local languages and there has many authors with marvellous writings. Notwithstanding, we could not get it from the computer rather public library.
On balance, innovative devices has the power to change many books and readers, while, substitute for public library is not a choice to establish. Governments must budget money for such informative centers to renovate and grow along with indispensable information technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing could introduce familiar authors and learners life through discuss in library...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60990712074 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86272091644 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628482972136 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9087282328 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.588235294 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104640316405 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348236709194 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378933305213 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712222426448 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393362589257 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.