Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people hold the view that the construction of public library is unnecessary due to the existance of online reading. I agree with this idea.

People can get access to more study resourses by searching online. Using a computer is convenient for readers to seek a wide range of e-books in short time. This means people obtain more choices on books, which is beneficial to broden their horizons. For example, people can learn different writing style and ideas when searching for books which describe the same historical period. This enable them to futher learn the ones that they prefer to read and know some about other people's unique viewpoints at the same time. In contrast, the volume of books are limited and people's options are also restricted.

In addition, building a public library is time-consuming. To create a commual library, the government construct high buildings and series of facilities to cointain a large volume of people and books. This means local authority need to spend a lot of money and hiring extentive labour to finish such a gaint project. Particularly, the government may spend the funds that should be invest on education and healthcare. Such waste can cause damage to citizens' quality of life.

However, building a library enables people to read book with more enthusiasm. Libraries provide space for people to read together, so that they are more likely to be focused after influenced by the atomosphere. For instance, people have no choice but to read if all others around are reading. Therefore, they get futher exposed to reading andtheir interest towards reading can alsobe developed.

In conclusion, public library is unnecessary because online reading provides more choices and it's also a waste of resourses to construct a library.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...create a commual library, the government construct high buildings and series of f...
^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'invested'?
Suggestion: invested
...ment may spend the funds that should be invest on education and healthcare. Such waste...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14827586207 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67973635277 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2474820359 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9444444444 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899930360891 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332780103816 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355532783294 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657702138316 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342168791419 0.056905535591 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.