maintaining public library is a waste of time and is not necessary since computer science now replace their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, the ever-advancing technology has involuntarily resulted in the abolition of various traditional values. One of which is the likelihood of public libraries being superseded by computer technology as a source of information. Although the importance of modern technology is irrefutable, I firmly believe that the precious significance of traditional libraries should not be neglected.
To commence with, public libraries are more than just information providers. To be specific, visiting public libraries has infiltrated in readers the habit of searching passionately for their sources of information. Instead of relying merely on a simple mouse click, library-goers are entitled to a more timely yet procedure of glancing through different storages for their wanted pieces of information. In the long run, these chains of actions nurtue in them a sense of patience as well as the growing gratitude for knowledge. This could be reasoned in that the harder something is achieved, the more appreciated it is.
Adding further, public libraries are more beneficial than computer technology in a way that they assure readers of a better physical health. By this, I mean the deleterious outcome of too much reliance on the internet and computer screen has long been among the greatest concerns of parents with children between the age of 13 and 18. With that being stated, public libraries remain a reliable source of information that guarantee readers of both their knowledge-acquisition and their physical health.
Granted, advocates for the replacement of conventional libraries with modern technology point out that computers have the ability to provide users with information in the most convenient way. Much as I agree with such statements, I firmly believe that in the era where people are constantly following a quick-paced lifestyle, it is of utmost significance to preserve the long-established values to help them appreciate the meaningfulness of their beings.
All in all, given the handiness of cutting-edge technology in supplying information, public libraries should not be eradicated in today’ era, for it is a reservoir of traditional values that drives people’s life towards betterment in their personal development.
7
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tterment in their personal development. 7
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, i mean, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54178674352 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32082019321 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541786743516 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.226659608 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.357142857 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160296729921 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605230003878 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413911164324 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908687452164 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207566064222 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.