In many cities, planners have separated schools, homes, shops and offices into specific areas which are widely separated from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for city residents?
Nowadays, many cities are planned to be separated into specific areas which have different functions. In this essay, I will examine its benefits and drawbacks and give my opinion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that independent blocks with specific functions can be better managed. This is because governments do not need to consider too much factors except the main function of each area. For example, mangers can limit the number of vehicles to reduce the traffic noise in school areas as there are not too much people like office areas. In addition, different areas could improve the efficiency of limited cities’ land resources. Compared with mixed layout, buildings with same functions will share a larger land, so they have more room to develop.
On the other hand, nonetheless, distant blocks are not convenient for city dwellers living in accommodations far from other blocks, they have to spend much time on the way to workplace or shops, causing troublesome to their daily lives. Furthermore, separated cities would have stress in transportation. Large number of people need to transfer long distance, which could increase the number of personal vehicles and cause frequent traffic congestions.
To summarize, separating cities by different functions is a good policy to promote each area’s development but pose heavy pressure to both personal commuting and traffic system. In the final analysis, therefore, one can conclude that cities should not be constructed separately, planners should mix different kinds of services in a city to provide higher quality of life to citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...governments do not need to consider too much factors except the main function of eac...
^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...se in school areas as there are not too much people like office areas. In addition, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37549407115 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81657094918 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3705022806 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253714906405 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917903161586 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776691134947 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15551245839 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478018729802 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.