In many countries the cost of living is rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? What measures can be taken to deal with this problem?
It is true that the budget for a living is increasing in a range of nations. Several problems have resulted from this proclivity and they should be mitigated in some effective manners.
As living costs increase, several related problems can be anticipated. Firstly, the obvious effect of this trend is that the living standards of residents decrease. As soon as the expenditure of living soars, people immediately cut down on the budget for daily activities including food and health care in the short run, which also diminishes the total demand of society. As a result, the reduction of consumption leads to the abundant supply of merchandise that causes manufacturing enterprises to face difficulties in the long run. Secondly, in the future citizens tend to decline the budget for other commodities rather than staple ones, and this tendency might bring about the fall in education as well as the rise in crime rates. If citizens fail to afford their living costs, they will be prone to become robbers or burglars.
There are several actions that governments could take to address the problems described above. The first solution is that national authorities might implement the price stabilization plan. It is obvious that if policy-makers intervene to the inflated price, the economic disturbances will be inhibited. Moreover, the second solution is that governments should concentrate on economic development in the long term, which contributes to the improvement of the citizens’ income. From an economic perspective, as the residents’ income augments along with the costs of living, the expenditure for living remains the same. For instance, the Europeans do not suffer from economic issues although the living costs in Europe countries are at the top of the world.
In conclusion, despite the fact that accelerating in living expenses in a number of countries is detrimental to our society seriously, some feasible plans can be carried out to solve the problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32911392405 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99006761232 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.451023702 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.266666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212595588055 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706218365633 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650006350012 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131497360641 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194805990039 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.