Many food are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and ecomically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its advantages?
It is true that local food helps the economy and environment better. Although this may have several disadvantages, I believe that the benefits are greater than the drawbacks.
On the one hand, focusing on consuming local food is harmful in some ways. Firstly, local food can not satisfy consumers’ variety demands because foreign food is usually attractive to local customers with new tastes. For example, StoxPlus statistics showed that cheese gains more popularity in Vietnam’s consumers rather than drinking milk. Secondly, selling local food to the only domestic consumer does not create high added value due to the fact that purchasing local food of foreigners consumers with higher price can reap more benefits for local producers. For instance, exported coffee brings higher benefits for processors than the domestic market.
On the other hand, I would argue that these drawbacks are outweighed by the benefits. The first prominent justification is that eating local food contributes to reducing carbon footprint which can be emitted in long transportation. Furthermore, concentrating on consuming local food helps fragmented farmers have more stable incomes. To specify, Vietnam’s fragile farmers highly rely upon their buyers on the market. In addition, the quality of local food is fresher than imported food. For instance, Vietnam’s fish usually fresher than foreign fish.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it is obvious to acknowledge the dominant benefits of this proclivity, but the possible drawbacks of focusing on chiefly eating local food should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64897959184 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95488780371 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583673469388 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6512474409 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186834988077 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077615065517 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674137679422 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119147871954 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239223570476 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.