It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. Do you think it is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation?
It is true that there has been an increase in juvenile delinquency. There are many reasons for this, but this phenomenon should be addressed in some effective ways.
There are three primary reasons why the rate of juvenile crime is higher these days. The first prominent justification is that the violent and sexual images gain in popularity in social media as there are not sufficient workforce for censoring these kinds of information in a huge amount. Furthermore, the more working people there are, the more their children do not receive parents’ attention, which means that they are prone to be exposed to bad things on the Internet. Last but not least, committing a crime could be considered as a fast way for teenagers to draw their parents’ attention. For example, the youngsters sometimes simply think that only when they do not comply with the rules, will their parents take more care of them, rather than imagining a potentially bad perspective for their future.
There are several actions that the government and enterprises could take to solve the problem described above. The first solution is that authorities could introduce the regulations on information on the Internet with the assistance of individual enterprises. Firms in the future could likely make a great contribution to the process of censoring violent and sexual content via creating applications dedicated for children only or automatically filtering the sensitive information on the Internet. The second solution is that policymakers should reduce working hours to helps parents have a more balanced lifestyle and spend more time on their children, which could prevent the root of juvenile delinquency. The final solution could be that public measures should be concentrated on the psychology of teenagers, which has not been a priority of children’s education in developing countries.
In conclusion, although there are some causes of the increasing crime rates in teenagers and this tendency is detrimental to our society seriously, some feasible measures can be taken to address the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37878787879 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98902338394 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8404895122 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.538461538 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219385090368 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795087723998 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550724550089 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143540587639 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424007725375 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.