In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should be required to work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some skeptics would advocate that the countryside should require more new teachers and doctors due to the lack of education and health care. However, there are others who argue that newly graduated teachers and doctors can freely select their workplaces as well as their occupations. In this essay, I will outline some following reasons to support the former idea.
On the one hand, choosing the suitable working environments where individuals can find motivation is essential to promote their career ladders. For instance, teachers who hold a high distinction degree should be encouraged to teach in gifted schools which usually take place in urban areas rather than rural areas to enhance themselves by teaching outstanding students. As a result, not only can working in the right areas figure out competent people but it can also help individuals to raise their potential abilities.
On the other hand, I believe that it is necessary to send new graduates to the countryside in several years due to some benefits. Firstly, since infrastructures and facilities in rural areas can be limited, the new arrival of well-trained teachers and doctors would provide the better education and health care services. Consequently, this would lead to the significant improvement in the living standard. Secondly, distributing skillful workers to the countryside can be an effective way to prevent the immigration to cities. In particular, if there are good teachers and doctors in rural areas, inhabitants would not need to go to urban areas for educational and medical purposes.
In conclusion, while many people think that teachers and doctors who recently graduate should have the right to select their desired workplaces, I believe that they should be distributed to the countryside for a period of working.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33916083916 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9070162216 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1358289561 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.8333333333 7.06120827912 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353786616287 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108618617475 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06991049392 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201960704193 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428424454711 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.