A positive and friendly educational environment is essential for students in the pursuit of their studies. However, many schools are facing a dilemma over the negative attitude of students in their classrooms. There are a number of reasons behind this problem and several solutions to tackle accordingly.
This phenomenon can be clarified by two primary reasons. Firstly, the emotional intelligence and cognitive abilities of students, particularly adolescents in middle and high schools, have not developed thoroughly. This can be explained for rebellious actions such as showing disobedient or disrespectful attitudes towards their teachers and peers. Thus, newly qualified teachers lacking of experiences may find it hideously challenging to deal with a variety of situations created by their students’ behaviour. Secondly, families may not pay proper attention to the social and emotional development of their children. Without firm guidance from parents, teenagers are likely to form negative manners from friends who are bad influences such as rudeness, being too proud or self-consciousness.
Since such issues are serious, there must be a coordination between schools and families in order to diminish this problem. On the one hand, parents should be powerful role models of their children because kids do tend to grow up to be a lot like their mothers and fathers. Parents with good personalities such as self-esteem, respectfulness or responsibility may positively influence their children, hence, make them become good students. On the other hand, beside academic knowledge, educational programs in schools should consistently emphasize the crucial role of social skills throughout lessons and counselling activities. Moreover, teachers must also be well-trained to make sure they are able to deal well with diversity and conflict in the classroom.
In conclusion, widespread negative behaviour in many educational institutions has inevitably become a serious problem and it can be explained by numerous reasons. Both families and schools are obligated to tackle this issue through proper attention and educational programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dealing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: dealing
...ences may find it hideously challenging to deal with a variety of situations created by...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80379746835 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21670949835 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610759493671 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2363111331 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157606366262 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562782419691 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442450405423 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110966301994 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038507452214 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.