In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
It is said that in modern life, living in extended families has become less popular among people, and they prefer to live alone or have a small family. I believe that this situation has both advantages and disadvantages.
The rise in one-person households and nuclear families can be seen as a positive trend for several reasons. Living independently lets people have more privacy and become a rounded person who can lonely cope with all changes that life throws at them. People who choose to live alone need to learn some life skills, such as cooking, cleaning and paying bills. All these activities make people more independent and self-reliant. In nuclear families, parents can have more opportunities to pay attention to their children. In this situation, parents can better support their children either emotionally or financially. Also, with having a small family, the increasing living costs do not put parents under pressure, as they can better manage their budget.
Despite the benefits mentioned above, the new living patterns can have some negative points. Living separately usually results in the reduction of communication between family members, which can cause people to feel lonely and become depressed after a while. This condition becomes worse when they need to struggle with different problems in their lives alone without any help. In nuclear families, children miss out on the emotional support and daily conversation that extended family can provide. This is because both parents need to work during the day. So, they can only spend time with their children at night, and most of the time, fatigue deprives them of this chance, while in big families, grandparents usually can compensate for the affection that children need.
In conclusion, in my view, the trend towards living alone or having a small family can be both positive and negative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as they can better manage their budget. Despite the benefits mentioned above, th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22516556291 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61873431185 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0592498648 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221724289959 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822538370739 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613922068234 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177786606117 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437780723876 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.