As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities, some governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is said that many businesses and industries are being moved to suburbs because of the growing problems associated with transport and accommodation. I believe that this situation has both advantages and disadvantages.
I can explain why it is beneficial if officials transmit businesses to rural areas. The most important reason is to solve the problem related to housing. Nowadays due to the population growth, many individuals find it difficult to find a house. If authorities try to discover remote areas or some regions near the big cities to develop them, they can make suitable conditions for people to have a better quality of life. For example, there will be enough land for governments to build more affordable apartments to accommodate more individuals. In addition to this, the transition of manufactories to provincial areas can not only reduce the environmental issues, such as air pollution and noise contamination but also help residents have better mental and physical health. Also, I think that there might be less financial pressure on adults, as the cost of living in the countryside might be a fraction of what it is in densely- populated cities.
Despite the benefits mentioned above, the transfer of companies out of big cities can also have some disadvantages. The development of bare areas and the creation of necessary facilities for occupancy need a huge budget and long-term plan. This can cause the residents of such areas not to have satisfying conditions for several years, which can disillusion them to continue living in suburban areas. For example, in my city, it took 13 years for officials to expand a region called Baharestan. Many people decided to move to big cities because they even did not have enough drinking water for 5 years and were forced to buy mineral water which was not cost-effective for low-income residents. Also, there were no rules in favour of people living in such a region being employed in factories. Many managers employed their families who lived in big cities. As a result, the development of Baharestan city not only did not solve the existing problems but also worsened the lives of many individuals.
In conclusion, in my view, the transmission of companies to the countryside can have some positive and negative consequences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1329787234 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98513747121 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9589188539 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171119186005 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526902911211 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412769736117 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110460614942 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540362323112 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.