Nowadays, some people support that traditional eating food is beneficial to the environment and the economy, while it is an apparent fact that ordering food has gained popularity and received a great deal of public attention. I believe that this trend is more likely to convince.
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks of ordering food. Firstly, customers are able to pay for an extra fee for the ship. This means to compare with eating at restaurants or stores, they are added a charge depending on the distance, furthermore, if some foods are delivered from a far distance, this charge would be significant. In Vietnam, a kilometer for ship spends on 10 thousand dongs, therefore, some ridiculous situations appear that a dish has the transport fee more much than its cost.
However, it is not negative that the benefits of this trend are outweighed by the drawback. Initial, the customers have several abundant choices. This means that because of the development of technology, there is a range of application for booking food, such as Foody, Grab… so, purchasers are satisfied completely with their requirements at all the quality. Secondly, saving time is guaranteed. One time for a meal spends about 5-10 minutes and it is convenient and necessary for a busy day. Finally, the cost of this trend seems to be prohibitively expensive, though, the programs sale off currently and it is not difficult to catch an opportunity having an excellent cheap meal.
To sum up, ordering food still witnesses a downside about the extra fee. But it is not doubtable that ordering food is common and does more positive than negative since its convenience such as a large choice, saving time and some hot deals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'programs'' or 'program's'?
Suggestion: programs'; program's
...be prohibitively expensive, though, the programs sale off currently and it is not diffic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtunity having an excellent cheap meal. To sum up, ordering food still witnesses...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97212543554 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80049216689 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588850174216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8734717544 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191590421072 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617236400051 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548409452984 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128278064015 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579640035691 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.